Did Mike Vick's Sentence Offend The Rule Of Law?

mike Vick, superstar quarterback of the Atlanta Falcons had it all; money, fame, respect, you water it. He was one of the leagues most exciting players until April 2007, where in a blink of an eye, he lost it all. microphone Vick was convicted and pleaded guilty of test game a get over conflict operation sightly orthogonal his home in Virginia. Vick was responsible for the torture and discharge of absolved dogs. He was immediately suspended by the NFL without patch up and he lost his endorsement deals, eventually leading himself to bankruptcy. microphone was primarily meterd to 5 years in prison, which was a harsher sentence than usual, tho was released after 23 months. The question still carcass; did Mike Vicks harsher treatment offend the rule of legal philosophy? I would obligate to say that the rule of law was non pique in this case because in all honesty, Mike Vick got what he deserved. No one is above the law, and although Vick was given an eccentric se ntence, a message was needed to be sent to opposite high-profile figures and celebrities.

existence such a powerful role pose to youths, Vick should have been more responsible for his actions. That is why his sentence was worse than it normally would have been. Vick was probably well aware that his dog fighting actions were illegal but he still act it. wherefore would someone with such a high reputation, lack to exuviate all of his accomplishments down the drain? His betrayal to the race who looked up to him was inexcusable. Mike Vick was certainly displayed as immature and haughty in this case. The jury d id what was right to give a harsh sentence, ! to uphold Mike Vick and other celebrities realize their actions can require others.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper