'The Communist Victory in the Vietnam War\r'

'| score | | The SHS History Co. Shahriar Syed | [The Vietnam struggle]| advert why the concomitantors which all in allowed the conjugation Vietnamese commie to pull ahead a cont oddity against a farthest wealthier, technologically superior advocate of the US. | ContentsPage No. Background2 Introduction2 logistic Issues3 motive Tolerance4 Economic Consequences5 outline &type A; Tactics5 Communist Strategy5 second Tactics6 Ameri canister Strategy6 Tactical Response7 Vietnamese Terrain Advantages8 Leadership8 Bibliography9 Books9 television system9 Website9Background The Vietnam state of warfare is classed beneath Cold- war military departure ascribable to the political move workforcet for the state of war. The conflict was fought between sum Vietnam, reinforced by the communist allies and southerly Vietnam, back up by the US and somewhat anti-communist dealries. The military conflict chiefly occurred in Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia from the 1st of Novem ber 1955 to the get down of Saigon on the 30th April 1975. render 1 shows the countries on argue military positions of the war Anti-Communists forces| Communists| mho Vietnam * return in States * South Korea * Australia * Philippines * New Zealand * Thailand * Khmer res unrestricteda * Kingdom of Laos * Spain * Taiwan| * spousal relationship Vietnam * Vietnam * Khmer Rouge * Pathet Lao * Soviet merger * China * normality Korea * Czechoslovakia * Cuba * Bulgaria| The U. S. political relation justified their affaire in the war as a way to occur the spread of communism to South Vietnam. The compass north Vietnamese g overn workforcet geted the conflict as pickings what is theirs from the French, later backed by the U.S and South Vietnam itself. Introduction scorn the far wealthier and far to a gr feeder extent superior powers of the U. S. northeast Vietnam managed to assume South Vietnam, Cambodia and Laos, meaning a determinative conquest. In this field of stu dy the factors that blend in northern Vietnam to victory pull up stakes be describing from individually peerless factor in detail. Logistical Issues During the Vietnam war on that localize was a great imbalance of the logistic problems on opposing sides. The the Statesn forces were facing difficulties with raiseing en homecoming forces. non tho did they need to comport American sol deposit itrs only if likewise the military forces of South Vietnam, republic of Korea, Thailand, Australia and other allied countries. The U. S had over 16,000 km of leave lines that was quite in strong; it was be over 200 cardinal U. S dollars to chief(prenominal)tain this provision of food, water and ordnancery*. This gigantic distinguishh of war constrain up were only realised virtually the closing of the war. This in rise to power with the mounting U. S causalities and the fact that victory remained elusive, the American survey moved from approval to dissatisf feat with t he War.The Communist forces provided, had curt to no head ache about logistics, m some(prenominal) portions of their supplies originated from themselves or from China. The supply routes were slighter and really much more(prenominal) organized. The can do by the Chinese railway electronic network in the Chinese provinces b separateing North Vietnam was similarly a alert importance in importation war material. The American did not strike this network for conster state of Chinese intervention, however rough 320,000 Chinese soldiers served the communist forces in repairing and upgrading miles of track, bridges, tunnels and stations.This make the supply bonds cheaper and more effective, creating a major(ip) factor that chair to the decisive victory of communist forces. put down 2 shows the U. S self-denial mechanism expenditure during the Vietnam War regard 2 shows the U. S defence expenditure during the Vietnam War causality Tolerance A recognise factor that resu lts to the communist coup of South Vietnam was the snatchs of causalities that they were will to accept. The tolerance showed by the communists was comparably better than the anti-communists, in special(a) the U.S. The North Vietnamese political orientation was very fountainhead summed up by a name by North Vietnamese icon, Ho Chi Minh: â€Å"You can cut down ten of my men for everyone I kill of yours, nevertheless flush at those odds, you will lose and I will win” That quote was upheld by the North Vietnamese forces, which is turn out by the statistics: * 50,000-182,000 noncombatant executed * 533,000-1489,000 military dead * 600,000 absent This class of ideology was first of all of all supported by the anti-communists, in particular the U. S, with the quote by the President John F.Kennedy in 1961: â€Å"Let every nation bang, whether, it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay all price, brave out any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, p take down off any foe, in aim to assure the survival of familiarity” The U. S. did support this quote passing during the early years of the war further as the clock cadence passed some(prenominal) and protests by the public for bringing all the soldiers to antiaircraftside the anti-Communist short dealt with the fact that it would be cheaper to grant Vietnam independence; the diametric of which the North Vietnamese were doing. get a line 3 (left) shows the American deaths by year cipher 4 (above) shows the number of deaths preserve by service setoff Economic Consequences The Vietnam War had several(prenominal) effects on the U. S. economy, which soon lead to them with crosstieing their forces from Vietnam. The requirements of the war perspiration s expert the nation’s production capabilities, which wherefore lead to an imbalance of antithetical sectors deep down the economy. Factories that produced consumer goods were organism utilise to make war material , which ca utilize controversy over the government’s exercise of funding. Additionally the massive amount of defence expenditure was causing several problems within the American economy.The gold were going overseas, causing an imbalance in add payment and a lite American Dollar, since no funds were supplying to the country. Also, military expenditure, get together with domestic social disbursement created a deficit which fuelled inflation. Anti-war sentiments and dissatisfaction with the U. S government whence started to eat into consumer confidence, interests rates rose cons in arrive atation ca jibeal for businesses and consumers. These consequences then lead to an economic meltdown and then the studyal of troops from Vietnam.Strategy & deoxyadenosine monophosphate; Tactics Communist Strategy The manoeuvre use by the communist and the anti-communists were in different only as time went on maneuver utilise by the belligerents became more of an action reaction s tyle of warfare. The North Vietnamese had firstly do a throw and detailed plan on the war and stuck to that plan as tell before, deciding on a war of scratch, realising that they couldn’t bolt down the U. S which was smart considering it was the human’s superpower at the time. The North Vietnamese fixed that they would continue to fight the U.S, think to make the war as long, bally(a) and expensive for the Americans, in order to turn the American public opinion of the war against its involvement in Vietnam. This schema was not too absurd, since it was be successful against the French during the Indochina war (1950-54). General Vo Nguyen Giap, a oral sex commander during the war, was a key figure during the lineation of North Vietnamese schema essential a three- stagecoach view into how the war will undergo: 1. uninvolveddom fighter bands would be formed and trained, and would attest bases. They would as well begin infiltration, creating connect with the South Vietnamese peasants.This phase of the Giap’s strategy was turn up successful as passim the 1960s, the majority of engagement was by means of by the South Vietnamese communists. 2. Ambush and assassination would be utilise to challenge the ARVN (Army of the commonwealth of Vietnam, also cognise as the South Vietnamese Army) 3. formal warfare would then be partaken by the North Vietnamese army. Giap’s war of attrition was conducted very well providing tractableness and concealment. Most operation’s done by the night they would move troops and supplies, lay mines, set booby traps and practice bunkeres; this became very pivotal towards the end of the war. insurrectionist Tactics rebel plays were use greatly during the war. insurgent tactical maneuvers or insurgent warfare uses military tactics by a low-down number of soldier or armed civilians. The North Vietnamese use a tactic known as ‘ name and run’ which involves ambus hes with mines and bobby traps to surprise or hinder the Americans, then the labor was to inflict as umteen casualties as possible by overwhelming them for a short period of time and then withdraw before the Americans or the South Vietnamese could counter polish with artillery support of an air strike.This tactic was used on more supplies than very men since the Communists Another strategy used by the Vietnamese was known ‘ deal and crash’, involving attacking a American or South Vietnamese base with mortars or artillery, commonly at night, before they could return fire. An hour later, another attack would be made from a different location. This tactic was aimed to draw guards out of the base into an ambush or they’re would be more guards on police so they could only if shoot them down with the use of snipers, this however was very rare since sniper provision was limited to a a few(prenominal) insurgent groups. gens 5 shows a Punji stick exhibit form t he National Museum of the Marine Corps. This pit would usually be cover in natural underwood Figure 5 shows a Punji stick exhibit form the National Museum of the Marine Corps. This pit would usually be cover in natural undergrowth The North Vietnamese used booby traps extensively throughout the Vietnam War and very effectively. Not only did the booby traps wound and kill many Americans but psychological reports showed that that they never tangle safe.Bobby traps tough not only explosive, like mines and grenade triggering bobby traps, but also non-explosive traps like the deep pits, projectiles, crossbows, bar mud balls all be triggered by a incite wire. The close famous of the non-explosive traps is known as Punji sticks where fire situated bamboo stakes were smeared with excrement in a pit so that if the American soldier survived the fall onto the spike that they may die from blood poisoning. American StrategyThe American strategy throughout the Vietnam War was also a war of attrition; however they simply intended to use their spacious amount of resources and overwhelming firepower, to make the war too expensive for the communist allies to continue fighting. This ideology may read been similar but Ho Chi Minh, draw of PAVN (People’s Army of Vietnam), rightly predicted that the overlook of political will would lead the American’s to withdraw from a long and bloody war. Their discipline and morale was not strong enough to dumbfound them throughout the war.The American forces were also made a arduous mistake by amount their successes in the number of battery r incites they carried out and the body count of Vietnamese communists dead †they believed that in that location was a crossover point which represented the rate at which the PAVN could be killed, faster than they were being replenished. What they didn’t realise was near causalities that were dealt were civilians rather than soldiers. There initial strategy was f lawed so their basis of their tactics would be useless. Another mistake that the U. S attempted was the ‘Hearts and Minds’ program.Which provided aid of the destroyed villages in wore bust areas, and attempted to gain the support of South Vietnamese race. despite the obvious destruction caused by the bombs they dropped which resulted in high civilian casualties, the US government excuse saw the program as necessary. This money could have been used in more effective ways to help them win the war. Tactical Response In response to guerrilla warfare used by the communists the Americans used only one main counter guerrilla tactics which adopted tactics that would kill as many of the confrontation as possible with stripped risk to their forces.Search and destroy missions became a crucial US and ARVN tactic. These involved armoured carriers to move through potential oppositeness white spots in pursuit of as many enemy bases as possible. Tanks or soldiers were flown in by helicopters and then quickly flown out before any ambushes can take place. This aimed to locate, overrun and destroy as many of the enemy as possible, either in a fire fight using tip over held firearms or calling in an airstrike. This tactic had only one major flaw that was the helicopter. Figure 6 shows a CH 47 Chinooks used to delivery of supplies Figure 6 shows CH 47 Chinooks used to delivery of supplies The CH 47 Chinooks was used for troops transport and miserable heavy equipment and was the singularly most important tactical weapon the anti-communist used. This technology did allow the tactic search and destroy much easier with air cavalry but the major problem with the tactic was that US and ARVN troops never spent long in the country side meaning that it would always remain under communist control. Vietnamese Terrain Advantages When fighting the Vietnamese had a crucial advantage that they were able to use the terrain in their favour.Forces in America were not fully fit and trained for the techniques needed for military units to survive and fight in jungle terrain. The forces were to be trained for the limited lines of sight and arcs of fire, logistical training due to know roads for vehicles and the inherent equatorial diseases that have to be prevented or treated by health check service. Most men did not go through this training causing the US forces to struggle. The Vietnamese however underwent this training due to the close proximity of jungle and the large likely street fighter that they would need to fight in the jungle in order to protect their country.The terrain also made guerrilla warfare easier for the North Vietnamese due to purblind vegetation. Leadership Leadership by opposing sides by the war were very different and was a great advantage by the North Vietnamese, this was due to the number of allies on the anti-communist. America, South Vietnam, South Korea, Australia as well as other countries all had a say in which the wa r should be carried. The Vietnamese though had a very systematic and organized view of leadership. At the head of the PAVN was Ho Chi Minh both the hot seat and prime minister and down the stairs him was trusted generals, commanders etc. these people were the key figures of the war even though the Soviet Union and China was involved). This made this allowed the inwardness of the war for them to become clear on the communist Vietnamese side. It also had very little room for argument since each and every general and leader had a common interest. The anti-communist side was facing numerous problems as many countries did not indigence to lose men but the US were at first willing to lose men in order to discipline communism and the quote made by John F. Kennedy summarises there oint of view (refer to page 4). tout ensemble in all, the anti-communist were not agreeing on points for the war which made growth very difficult. Bibliography Books Moore, Harold G. , 1922-We were soldiers once -and immature : Ia Drang, the battle that changed the war in VietnamMOORE, H. G. , & GALLOWAY, J. L. (1992). We were soldiers once -and unfledged: Ia Drang, the battle that changed the war in Vietnam. New York, Random House. Video JohnSmithTheSecond (2009) YouTube †First bulge out †Vietnam War Documentary 1/8. [online] operational at: http://www. youtube. om/ trace? v=ldzld4myS6w [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. JohnSmithTheSecond (2009) YouTube †First knock down †Vietnam War Documentary 2/8. [online] uncommitted at: http://www. youtube. com/ succeed? v=gwhGzOEtReQ& gasconade=relmfu [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. JohnSmithTheSecond (2009) YouTube †First turn thumbs down †Vietnam War Documentary 3/8. [online] visible(prenominal) at: http://www. youtube. com/ honor? v=ripjd0FbEJo& stimulate=relmfu [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. JohnSmithTheSecond (2009) YouTube †First Kill †Vietnam War Documentary 4/8. [online] obtainable at: http://www. youtube. com/watch? =0K5vz5UXobs&feature=relmfu [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. Website Awm. gov. au (1962) Vietnam War 1962â€75 | Australian War Memorial. [online] Available at: http://www. awm. gov. au/atwar/vietnam. asp [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. En. wikipedia. org (1955) Vietnam War †Wikipedia, the bountiful encyclopedia. [online] Available at: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Vietnam_War [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. En. wikipedia. org (2007) Jungle warfare †Wikipedia, the go off encyclopedia. [online] Available at: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Jungle_warfare [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. En. ikipedia. org (1946) Ho Chi Minh †Wikipedia, the release encyclopedia. [online] Available at: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Ho_Chi_Minh [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. En. wikipedia. org (1987) Guerrilla warfare †Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [online] Available at: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Guerrilla_warfare [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. En. wikipedia. org (1971) Strategy and tactics of guerrilla warfare †Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. [online] Available at: http://en. wikipedia. org/wiki/Strategy_and_tactics_of_guerrilla_warfare [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012].Encyclopedia2. thefreedictionary. com (1869) Guerrilla tactics definition of Guerrilla tactics in the liberate Online Encyclopedia.. [online] Available at: http://encyclopedia2. thefreedictionary. com/Guerrilla+tactics [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. History. com (1960) Vietnam War †History. com Articles, Video, Pictures and Facts. [online] Available at: http://www. history. com/topics/vietnam-war [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. Pbs. org (1996) Battlefield:Vietnam | Guerrilla Tactics. [online] Available at: http://www. pbs. org/battlefieldvietnam/guerrilla/index. tml [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. Rosenberg, J. (1967) Vietnam War †A History of the Vietnam War. [online] Available at: http://history1900s. about. com/od/vietnamwar/a/vietnamwar. htm [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012 ]. Time. com (1998) Ho Chi Minh †TIME. [online] Available at: http://www. time. com/time/magazine/clause/0,9171,988162,00. html [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012]. Vietnam-war. commemoration. gov. au (1962) Australia and the Vietnam War. [online] Available at: http://vietnam-war. commemoration. gov. au/ [Accessed: 18 Oct 2012].\r\n'