Persuasive Essay: Gay Marriage Essay

Kristin, you may kiss your bride, Kayla (qtd. in WCIV 1). These were the words that officially announce Kristin Anderson and Kayla Bennett the first analogous ride couple in to the south th Carolina on November 19 , 2014 (WCIV 1). The historic side material day was filled with love and nourishment from families around the country and the community in general. It was also a day where they found a peace of mind after the stress they certain from the previous month where they had the matrimony license and the wedding date set, provided only to be taken away by the states Attorney General once he filed appeals against the marriages. We were so excited to yield for the marriage license so when they took it away from us, it was analogous pulling the carpeting out from under our feet. Everything we were excited about just came crashing down (qtd. in WCIV 1). But then the wedding proceeded which allowed the couple to feel like they be truly married and finally allowed to claim a family of their own (WCIV 1). Changes like these argon happening all over the country, but the heated line of reasoning still goes on.One of the most common arguments is that race should not have their taxes going towards something they strictly believe is wrong (Marcellino et al. 1). Once gay marriages are legalized, benefits going to hetero arouseual couples would naturally go to alikesex couples. Those benefits implicate claiming a tax exemption for a spouse, receiving social security payments from a deceased spouse, and coverage by a spouses health insurance policy. While this is true, the taxes the people will be spe nding legalizing samesex couples will eventually come back and help the state or country economically (Marcellino et al. 35). A decade long force field by M.V. Lee Badgett and other economists concluded that planning marriages would make at least $1.5 billion dollars because of all the necessities of a wedding ceremony (Badgett 3).Legalizing same sexmarriage should not be about believing what people think it is morally wrong or right, but factually ground on the better of the economy and for the country as a whole. At UCLA School of Law, researchers studied the economics of those 11 states where samesex marriage is prohibited (Chokshi 1). The results were shocking and saw that the states would make more than $464 one thousand million in their first year of legalizing samesex marriages (Chokshi 1). Based off of real life situations, New Yorks Marriage Equality Act brought $259 million to the city after only a year (Covert 3). Given these reasons, the South Carolina Supreme Court should legalize samesex marriage because it would conduce financial gain to federal and state governments, allow samesex couples to receive the same insurance benefits as heterosexual couples, and make it easier for samesex couples to adopt, providing stable homes for children who would otherwise be left in protect care.