Pollution In The Backcountry - Snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park

Outline Of contaminant in the Backcountry1. Bush over turns Clintons plans to discard snowmobiles in Yellowstone National pose. (pro) a. Yellowstone get out continue to be polluted and degraded. (con)2. Business, industry and environment. a. Two opinions presented by distri unlessively position3. Identifying problems with the over turning of the Clinton giving medication ostracise.4. Identifying problems with the pollution in onward road vehicles.5. Identifying propaganda techniques used by both positioning.6. How credible is each side of the view? a. What be the credentials for each side?7. Which side move me as being the most empirical in presenting their case? 8. atomic number 18 there any reasons to believe the writers are biased?9. With which side of this debate do I personally approve with? Pollution In The BackcountryAs the population grows in this country we are developing and expanding areas that rush never seen the population like we are seein g these days. There are nearly 1200 people who live in the delicate community of West Yellowstone that thrives on tourism. There is good turnout in the summer and in the pass snowmobiling keeps the small town going. Over the prehistoric five years the governing body and multiple environmental agencies have tried to shut down snowmobiles in the National Park for pollution reasons. How would this concern the environment? How would this affect the local anesthetic industry? I will go through each side of this debate that has been taking place.On July 18, 2004 the rear of representative voted not to ban snowmobiles from the Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Park areas. Since 1996 the political relation has completed three major official assessments of snowmobiles impact on the set in winter (The newly York ... ... environmentally safe. Second I rally it is important to keep our bailiwick parks open to the people but this has shown the need to protect them to a poi nt so our children and grandchildren can savor these National Parks in the future. Third, It is nice to see that the case studies go on. Without this research we would not have a direction to go although expensive, I think it is well value it. The research needs to be compiled the right way by professionals and have no bias or slanted opinions infect the overall conclusion to the study.ReferencesThe brisk York Times Sept 17, 2002 pA30(N) pA28(L) opening 1 (7 col in)Heartland Institute. (2006). Retrieved January 15,2006, from http//www.heartland.orgNational Park Service. (2005). Retrieved January 18,2006, from http//www.nps.govThe New York Times June 18, 2004 pA26 col 04 (8 col in) Pollution In The Backcountry - Snowmobiles in Yellowstone National ParkOutline Of Pollution in the Backcountry1. Bush over turns Clintons plans to ban snowmobiles in Yellowstone National Park. (pro) a. Yellowstone will continue to be polluted and degraded. (con)2. Business, Indu stry and environment. a. Two opinions presented by each side3. Identifying problems with the over turning of the Clinton administration ban.4. Identifying problems with the pollution in off road vehicles.5. Identifying propaganda techniques used by either side.6. How credible is each side of the debate? a. What are the credentials for each side?7. Which side impressed me as being the most empirical in presenting their case? 8. Are there any reasons to believe the writers are biased?9. With which side of this debate do I personally agree with? Pollution In The BackcountryAs the population grows in this country we are developing and expanding areas that have never seen the population like we are seeing these days. There are almost 1200 people who live in the small community of West Yellowstone that thrives on tourism. There is good turnout in the summer and in the winter snowmobiling keeps the small town going. Over the past five years the Government and multiple environmenta l agencies have tried to shut down snowmobiles in the National Park for pollution reasons. How would this affect the environment? How would this affect the local industry? I will go through each side of this debate that has been taking place.On July 18, 2004 the House of representative voted not to ban snowmobiles from the Yellowstone and Grand Teton National Park areas. Since 1996 the government has completed three major official assessments of snowmobiles impact on the Parks in winter (The New York ... ... environmentally safe. Second I think it is important to keep our national parks open to the people but this has shown the need to protect them to a point so our children and grandchildren can enjoy these National Parks in the future. Third, It is nice to see that the case studies go on. Without this research we would not have a direction to go although expensive, I think it is well worth it. The research needs to be compiled correctly by professionals and have no bias or slanted opinions contaminate the overall conclusion to the study.ReferencesThe New York Times Sept 17, 2002 pA30(N) pA28(L) col 1 (7 col in)Heartland Institute. (2006). Retrieved January 15,2006, from http//www.heartland.orgNational Park Service. (2005). Retrieved January 18,2006, from http//www.nps.govThe New York Times June 18, 2004 pA26 col 04 (8 col in)