Critical Awareness of Values and Ethics Case study Essay

Critical Aw areness of Values and Ethics Case study - canvass ExampleAll three key figures - the two deceased and the murderer - in the incident cede a history of disrespect for the sanctity of marriage. Joe Korp was in two marital relationships before his affair with Tania Her military man. two Maria De Gois and Tania Herman did non consider having an affair with a married man a serious moralistic violation. The defence of Marias consent to feature on an internet swingers site by her relatives as an attempt to save a troubled marriage is laughable. You cannot save a marriage by cutting it to pieces. The al superstar saga is testimony to the lay waste to effects of the neglect of family set and marital commitment.The second issue is the narrow materialistic viewpoint with which the whole incident was evaluated by the whole system - the families of the deceased, the media, and even the Supreme Court judge. Financial gain was decidedly one of the motivations for Joe Korps cons piracy of killing his wife.Finally an issue that pops up is the propriety of removing life support systems for a patient who is not dead but is given up for dead by the doctors. There are various arguments both for and against mercy killing (Eckels,2005). This is an important issue, but I would not consider it cardinal in this context. The deed had been done. Maria was never coming back. Whether she was living dead or dead dead is a non-issue here although at other time or place it needs to be debated.Challenges to my values and moralsI cannot fathom the thought process of a self respecting man who decides to abandon his family for the saki of another lover. This is selfishness at its peak. To me this was the most devastating link in the whole chain of events that took place in Joe Korps life. It opened him out to the possibilities that lay outside of the boundaries that one keeps for oneself. The murderous attempt on Maria was null but the logical conclusion of this thought pro cess. When one chooses to rationalize to ones own self actions which are completely wrong, there is a whole paradigm shift in our own morality which leads to a deplorable cycle resulting in even more grievous actions.Maria Korp was a tragic victim of her husbands financial aspirations and emotional hunger. No one deserves to be killed, but I cannot help thinking that somewhere a certain responsibility for her own undoing lays on her. Till she came along Joe Korp was a married man with a family. Wasnt it she who opened him up to the possibility of unfaithfulness Was there not insensitivity not reasonable to the unfortunate Leonie but also to her children Maria Korp thought nothing of permanently destabilising the lives of three other volume for her own sake. Steve Deegan defended his sister Tania by describing her as vulnerable and unlucky in love. However how can one accept anyone justifying an act of attempting to kill another person on these grounds Disregard for the life of another is unacceptable. Needless to say she too displayed the same insensitivity to the needs and rights of others. Although one can argue that she did not know Joe was married. How can one explain the fact that she not only stuck with him after having been lied to by him, but also aided him in his desire to murder his wife The financial gain